logo

Ocean Conservation News

SearchRSS Feed

For Immediate Release:
2005-03-10
For More Information:
Contact Amy Peterson
206-568-2850

Cruise Ship Pollution Threatens Washington Businesses, Environment

As the new home of WashPIRG's environmental work, Environment Washington can be contacted regarding this news release.

SEATTLE—At a news conference on the Seattle waterfront today, the Washington Public Interest Research Group (WashPIRG) release a report detailing the risk cruise ship pollution poses to Washington's businesses and economy in the absence of meaningful regulations. The report "Cruising for a Bruising: Why Washington Needs Laws to Protect Its Waters from Cruise Ship Pollution" called on the Legislature to pass a bill that will more strictly regulate cruise ship pollution in Washington waters. California and Alaska, have already past strict cruise ship regulations, making Washington a potential target for increased pollution dumping from cruise ships.

Foremost among the risks, the report found, is the risk to Washington's coastal economy through the degradation of fish habitat, and the risk to the economy and human health posed by bacterial contamination of shellfish beds. It comes at a time when the state legislature is considering a bill, H.B. 1415, that would regulate cruise ship discharges.

"'Cruising for a Bruising' shows that our state is taking major risks by not regulating cruise ships," said Chris Wells, Oceans Associate for the Washington Public Interest Research Group (WashPIRG). "Puget Sound is already critically threatened by pollution—we've got thirty thousand acres of shellfish beds closed because the water is so contaminated. Alaska and California have already passed legislation just like the ones the report recommends, and there's not reason for Washington to be the dumping ground for the west coast."

Wells was joined by Anne Mosness, former salmon fisherwoman and currently West Coast Coordinator of the Marine and Fish Conservation Program at the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy.

"Obviously reducing pollution is a major concern for coastal states and fishermen and women who depend on healthy and productive oceans," Mosness said. "We see the importance of our marine environment every day, from providing essential wild fish for consumption, to supporting the livelihoods of fishing related businesses, to our culture as coastal residents. The pollution from the cruise ships industry is very detrimental to living creatures and marine water quality, and we must take strong action so we protect the ocean commons for future generations."

Some of the report's most important findings include:

- In a day, a typical cruise ship generates 30,000 gallons of sewage, or blackwater; 270,000 gallons of dish and bathwater, or graywater; 7,000 gallons of oil-contaminated bilge water; 23 gallons of toxic waste; and more than 11.5 tons of garbage.

- In Puget Sound, 30,000 of 165,000 acres of shellfish beds are closed due to bacterial contamination. Many more are in a threatened, near-closed category. The bacteria responsible for closures are those associated with human wastes - the same wastes generated on board cruise ships.

- The cruise industry's environmental record is poor: When Alaska tested wastewater being discharged by cruise ships in 2000—through Marine Sanitation Devices certified by the U.S. Coast Guard—concentrations of fecal coliform bacteria ranged as high as 100,000 times the federal standard.

- The worst instance of cruise ship dumping in Washington occurred in 2003, when a Norwegian Cruise Line ship dumped 16,000 gallons of raw sewage off Whidbey Island.

The report also recommends how to protect Washington waters from cruise ship pollution. Foremost among the recommendations, the report advocates that the state move from the voluntary Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) it signed with one cruise association last year to regulations that would be legally enforceable. The report recommends that regulations include bans on the discharge of blackwater (sewage), graywater (bath and dishwater), oily bilge water, and hazardous wastes; established penalties for violations; and a fee system to support a regulatory program at the Department of Ecology.

Legislation regulating cruise ship discharges has already been introduced by State Representative Mary Lou Dickerson. House Bill 1415 has been approved by the Natural Resources and Appropriations committees; currently the House Rules committee is considering whether to bring it to the floor of the House for a vote.

"I strongly believe the WashPIRG report strikes the right balance between protecting Washington's jobs today and Washington's environment and jobs in the future," said Representative Dickerson. "Legislation that I have proposed both last year and this year agrees with the basic principle that we need more than memos to protect the Puget Sound. We need laws, enforceability and accountability. And this is the right direction."

H.B. 1415 includes a ban on the discharge of untreated gray and blackwater; sampling and reporting requirements for ships discharging treated gray and blackwater in Washington waters; penalties of up to $10,000 per day, per violation; and a per-passenger fee system to pay for the Department of Ecology's program.

"We're delighted to see legislation that will offer better protections for Washington waters from cruise ship pollution," Wells said. "The report does plenty to criticize the past records of all the major cruise lines, but Holland America came right to the table this year to be part of the process, and we thank them for that. We hope other cruise ship line will follow their leadership"

In the United States, several states have already passed legislation regulating what cruise ships can discharge. On the west coast, California has banned the discharge of nearly all cruise ship wastes, while Alaska has adopted legislation very similar to H.B. 1415.